Essay on An Argument in Favor of the Atomic Bomb - 912 Words

â€Å"Truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was purely military. Truman believed that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well. Prolonging the war was not an option for the President,† (ushistory.org 1). President Truman and the United States government made a fair decision by dropping the atomic bomb on the Japanese citizens in Hiroshima and Nagasaki during 1945. The bomb allowed the United States to appear more powerful and led to them influencing the rest of the world. The dropping of the atomic bomb was also a just response to the previous atrocities committed by Japan to other countries including the United States. In the long run, the bomb saved more lives that would have been lost in the war, since the bombs caused the†¦show more content†¦In this layout of the Marshall Plan, the United States planned to help countries in Western Europe develop. The United States used the power they gained from dropping the bomb to aid countries. If the bomb was not dropped at this time, the United States would not have had the opportunity to become a leader. The advancement of other countries would not have taken place as well as level the wrong doings of the Japanese. Two thousand four hundred and three Americans were killed and one thousand one hundred and seventy eight were wounded on the early morning of December 7, 1941; when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor (Pearl Harbor Statistics 1). The dropping of the atomic bomb was a reasonable reaction to the atrocities, including the bombing of Pearl Harbor, committed by Japan to many countries. A man named Marine Corporal E.C Nightingale was on the USS Arizona when the Japanese attacked. â€Å"The bodies of the dead were thick, and badly burned men were heading for the quarterdeck, only to fall apparently dead or badly wounded. The Major and I went between No. 3 and No. 4 turret to the starboard side and found Lieutenant Commander Fuqua ordering the men over the side and assisting the wounded. Charred bodies were everywhere† (Eyewhitness to History 1). Not only did the Japanese leave the beaches and people of Hawaii in ruins, they have also taken many POWs, especially during WWII, and tr eated themShow MoreRelatedHiroshima; Right or Wrong? Essay992 Words   |  4 Pages1) Describe the main arguments, reasons, and evidence that support the perspective of Historian A. -Historian A had a lot of reasonable and strong perspectives on the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. She views the United States was not justified in dropping the bomb. A huge argument begins with the U.S. knowing that Japan was trying to surrender. This is a great example of unnecessarily kicking someone when they are already down. The Japanese wanted peace and tried to surrender, the onlyRead MoreEssay On The Atomic Bomb837 Words   |  4 Pagesbasis, yet this type of strategy is still in use. Is the bombing of innocent people justified if it ultimately brings an end to the war? The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II clearly exemplifies the ethical question of whether bombing civilians was right or wrong. The decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not clear cut. Harry S. Truman and his associated generals (Stimson and Groves) had to come to a conclusion on how to swiftly endRead More Trumans Decision to use the atomic mom1507 Words   |  7 Pages Truman’s decision to use atomic weapons has long been a controversial subject throughout the decades after he used it. Many scholars and people who surrounded the president at the time published memoirs and books about the decision to use the weapon. As years went, more works of writing and information were released which added more information to the vast knowledge we have of the decision to drop the bomb and of what the Japanese faced after the event took place. J. Samuel Walker wrote a book calledRead MoreHiroshima, By Robert Lewis, Co Pilot Of Enola Gay1473 Words   |  6 Pagessupplies that dwindled as the days passed (Morton 339.) Months before the nuclear bomb had been tested, Japan was in no position to pose a real threat to the United States. Many United States governmental personnel were aware that victory was assured at this point. According to General Henry â€Å"Hap† Arnold, Army Air Forces commander, as stated in his 1949 Global Mission, â€Å"It always appeared to us that atomic bomb or no atomic bomb the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse† (Weber.) Though JapanRead MoreThe Nuclear Bombing On World War II Essay2204 Words   |  9 Pagesto allow for an analysis of the circumstances during the war and commentary of the decision to drop the bomb after the war ended. The first source which will be evaluated is Minutes of Meeting Held at the White House on Monday, 18 June 1945 at 1530. The origin of the source is important because it is a primary source that reveals the discussions that would affect whether or not the atomic bomb would be dropped. The meeting included high ranking military officers that were knowledgeable of how anRead MoreGlobal Disarmament And Non Proliferation Culture875 Words   |  4 Pagestransformed in practical improvements through the construction of partnerships with international organizations and governments and with the provision of adequate financial resources. 2.3 Japans relevant role in DNPE Japan as the only country where atomic bombs has been ever deployed, and the only country which witnessed at firsthand and experienced the devastating effects of nuclear bombing over its society and territory has played a key role in the promotion of DNPE. Japan has a strong commitment andRead MoreWas It Morally Justifiable for Truman to Use Two Nuclear Weapons Against Japan During Wwii?1182 Words   |  5 Pagestargets, having them destroyed would cripple Japanese both industrially and militarily; they would have to submit themselves. Bombardment was a very effective tactic during WWII. All the countries were using the method, it didn’t matter what type of bomb was dropped or by whom, everyone else was doing it too. The Japanese were not innocent themselves. They had begun the entire feud when they attacked Pearl Harbor without warning; and therefore bringing the isolationist Americans into the war. If theyRead MoreWorld War II The Greatest Military Powers At The Time1739 W ords   |  7 Pagespower never touched before in military history. The Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, which instantly killed 80,000 Japanese citizens. This revolutionized the art of War and every other country knew that there were new standards of war and that people had the power to destroy the world. The Atomic Energy Commission and its successor, which became the Department of Energy, later controlled the creation of the Atomic bomb and its research, which happened during The Manhattan Project. The DepartmentRead MoreLeo Szilard s A Petition Essay2408 Words   |  10 Pagesbefore the Atomic bombing of Hiroshima. The petition came at a time in the war when America had already committed massive amounts of resources to creating a nuclear weapon. It was written by Leo Szilard; his signature appears on the bottom left corner of the document. Szilard was a key figure in the Manhattan project, working at the Chicago Metallurgical lab. The purpose of his petition initially appears obvious; it seems that Szilard wants the President to reconsider the plan to bomb Japan in lightRead MoreCritique for Levins Case for Torture Essay examples1010 Words   |  5 Pagesscenarios which not only allow for the use of torture, but which in fact necessitate it. This is Michael Levins core argument in The Case for Torture (Newsweek, 1982). Levin effectively advances his argument primarily by presenting a number of hypothetical cases, designed to force the skeptical reader to question whether his opposition to torture is truly absolute. Levins argument also relies on employing analogy as a rhetorical device and considering a number of counterarguments to his position